Section: Thursday, 18 September 2025 | Opposition Matters 2025 | e-learning centre

Kursübersicht

Thursday, 18 September 2025

  • Thursday, 18 September 2025

    • Programme

      13.00-13.10   Welcome and introduction

      Steve Rowan, EPO Vice-President, Patent Granting Process
      Julia Gwilt, Patent Attorney, epi

      13.10-13.55   Oral proceedings over several days. Their usefulness and how the opposition division decides in advance

      Oral Proceedings run up to one day as a general rule. However, there are cases which necessitate longer processing time to achieve a successful conclusion. How the division decides and why are explained here. It is complemented by a viewpoint from the patent attorney angle.

      Lead: epi

      Régis Quélavoine, Director Opposition, EPO
      Ben Husband, Patent Attorney, epi

      Oral Proceedings over several days

       

      13.55-14.40   Opposition proceedings and UPC

      The session will focus on the impact of/and interplay between the opposition proceedings before the EPO and revocation/infringement proceedings before the UPC, in particular acceleration of the opposition proceedings and stay of the revocation proceedings in the case of parallel proceedings pending. Presentation by patent attorney followed by a round table.

      Lead: epi

      Katarzyna Walert, Lawyer, EPO
      Nathaniel Taylor, Patent Attorney, epi
      Tobias Pichlmaier, Judge, UPC

      Opposition proceedings and UPC

             
             14.40-15.55   Break

      15.55-16.40   Artificial Intelligence in opposition proceedings, pilot for minutes

      This session provides a state-of-the-art comparison of one of the hottest topics in IP. The guidelines on Artificial Intelligence will be looked at through the different lenses of the EPO and the epi. There will also be an update on the pilot project on minute taking via Artificial Intelligence in Oral Proceedings.

      Lead: EPO

      Régis Quélavoine, Director, Opposition, EPO
      Timothey Powell, Patent Attorney, epi

      Artificial Intelligence in Opposition proceedings